Skills for Work: Personal Development Planning
Personal development planning is a Pearson Skills for Work unit in which learners identify their skills, strengths and areas for development, set goals, and produce and review a personal development plan, with a SWOT analysis at Level 1 and Level 2 and SMART actions at Level 2. It is one 20 hour unit that learners combine with others into a Pearson Skills for Life or Skills for Work Award, Certificate or Diploma. The centre sets and marks the assignment. Literacy sits in explaining why planning matters, describing themselves, discussing goals, writing the plan and reflecting on feedback. Numeracy is light: timeframes, SMART targets, prioritising tasks and rating scales.
- Awarding body
- Pearson
- Level
- Entry Level 1 to Level 2
- Guided learning hours
- 20
- First taught
- September 2027
- Amount of literacy work
- Medium
- Amount of numeracy work
- Low
- Specification
- Open the specification
How this unit is assessed
- Entry Level (Entry 1, Entry 2, Entry 3): One assessment criterion at each of Entry 1, Entry 2 and Entry 3, rising from stating simple facts about personal development and showing progress towards a goal given by the teacher (Entry 1), through planning towards an agreed goal (Entry 2), to setting goals and actions to improve own skills and working towards a basic plan with timelines (Entry 3). Assessed internally by the centre through a centre-devised assignment, with Pearson standards verification. 20 guided learning hours, graded Pass or Fail.
- Level 1 and Level 2: One assessment criterion at each level: learners describe (Level 1) or explain (Level 2) the role and importance of personal development and produce a personal development plan, with short- and mid-term goals and realistic timelines at Level 1, and short-, mid- and long-term goals with SMART actions at Level 2. The guidance adds a SWOT analysis and reviewing the plan. Assessed internally by the centre, with Pearson standards verification. 20 guided learning hours, graded Pass or Fail.
Skills that use Interpreting data
-
Rating skills on scales in a skills audit
Pearson's mapping lists Likert and traffic light scales in skills audits and ordering tasks and milestones as numeracy links. Learners rate their skills and can compare ratings over time, but no criterion requires numerical ratings.
Numeracy: Representing data, Interpreting data
Getting pupils ready
- Year 7
- Pupils rate ten skills red, amber or green and count how many of each colour they have.
- Year 8
- Pupils rate their skills on a 1 to 5 scale at the start and end of a half term and draw a bar chart comparing the two.
- Year 9
- Pupils compare their own skill ratings with ratings from a teacher, draw conclusions about which skills to develop, and note why self ratings can mislead.
Show the specification wording and the LNF statements
Where it is in the specification: Unit SfW 2, Annexe C, page 118
“Likert/traffic-light scales in audits; ordering tasks and milestones”
Progression step 3
I can represent data using:
- lists, tally charts, tables, diagrams and frequency tables
- bar charts, grouped data charts, line graphs and conversion graphs
- pictograms where one symbol represents more than one unit using a key
- Venn and Carroll diagrams.
I can draw conclusions from data and recognise that some conclusions may be misleading or uncertain.
Progression step 4
I can select and construct appropriate charts, diagrams and graphs with suitable scales.
I can draw conclusions from data and recognise that some conclusions may be misleading or uncertain.
Good to know
- The unit is SfW 2 and is worth 20 guided learning hours (Unit summary, page 5), the same size as the WJEC unit. A unit counts once: "Learners can only achieve each unit once, at a single level" (Rules of Combination, page 6).
- The command verbs set the literacy level: Entry 1 learners "State", Entry 2 "Outline", Entry 3 "Identify", Level 1 "Describe" and Level 2 "Explain" the role and importance of personal development (assessment criteria, page 16).
- The guidance sets minimum amounts, such as at Level 1 describing "at least three of each" of skills, strengths and areas for development and "at least two resources and two people" needed for the goals (page 18).
- Discussion is expected from Level 1: learners "should be able to discuss their skills with others" (Essential information for assessment decisions, Level 1, page 18), so spoken evidence such as observation records is useful.
- Pearson's own mapping gives literacy as "Reflective discussion and written plans" and numeracy as SMART goals, timelines and rating scales in audits (Annexe C, page 118).
- AI must be acknowledged: "If AI is used, the final submission must be in the learner's own words" (Requirements relating to permitted/prohibited resources, page 21).
- Document slips: this Skills for Work specification says "Every unit in our Skills for Life qualifications includes an Authorised Assessment Brief" (page 8), and the units section points to "Section 6 Glossary" when the glossary is Section 7 (page 11).
Links with other qualifications
Personal development planning links with the WJEC Skills Suite units Exploring career pathways and Career creativity, which share writing about own strengths and interests and planning steps towards a future job, and with Overcoming barriers, Building a growth mindset and Work experience, which share reflective writing and reviewing progress. GCSE Business, which the WJEC version of this unit names as a linked qualification, is the closest GCSE link. Compared with the WJEC Personal development planning unit, both are 20 guided learning hours with SMART goals at Level 2, but WJEC spreads the writing across four learning outcomes including responding to feedback, while Pearson centres on one written personal development plan, adds a SWOT analysis at Level 1 and Level 2, and expects learners to discuss their skills and goals with others.
Source: Pearson Entry Level 1 to Level 2 Skills for Work Award, Certificate and Diploma Qualifications Specification, Issue 1, August 2026, Unit SfW 2: Personal development planning.